Wimbo wa Adele umekuwa wimbo uliopendwa sana kwa muda mfupi sana kama ulikua hujui #MTU #MZURI wimbo huu wa adele unaambiwa ndio wimbo uliorudiwa kuimbwa mara nyingi na wasanii mbali mbali duniani kote.

lakini unajua kwamba rekodi zinaonesha wimbo huo una kama siku 88 tu hewani, hesabu ambayo kwa tafsiri nyingine ni miezi mitatu !!

Ninayo stori ambayo wameiandika pia kwenye page ya CNN mtandaoni kwamba wimbo wa ‘Hello‘ uliomrudisha Adele kwenye kilele cha kusikilizwa kwa mara nyingine, wimbo huo umetazamwa mara bilioni 1 kwenye channel ya Youtube.

Ngoma hiyo inakuwa ya 17 kuingia kwenye rekodi ya kutazamwa na watu zaidi ya bilioni 1 kwenye mtandao huo.Rekodi zinaonesha mwaka 2013 wimbo wa ‘Roar‘ staa wa Marekani, Katty Perry uliingia kwenye rekodi ya kutazamwa mara bilioni moja baada ya siku 487, mwaka 2014 kukawa na rekodi ya wimbo ‘Black Space‘ wa Taylor Swift uliingia rekodi ya kuangaliwa mara bilioni moja baada ya siku 238

Mwaka 2015 umekuwa mwaka wa Adele, wimbo ‘Hello‘ umeingia kwenye rekodi hiyo ndani ya siku 87, huenda ndio wimbo ambao umetazamwa na watu wengi zaidi ndani ya siku chache kwenye rekodi za Youtube
.....Tuendelee kuiboresha familia ya #WATU#WAZURI for more info nifate instagram kwa @pascalzambwe

kama hukupata nafasi #MTU #MZURI ya kuingia kwenye list ya watu walioutazama wimbo wa adele mara nyingi zaidi duniani, unaweza kuitazama hapa chini nimekuwekea #MTU #MZURI.

 

kama ulikua hujui #MTU#MZURI kuna Baadhi ya vitu vipo hapa duniani, vitu vinavutia zaidi kwa kuviangalia vipo dunia hii tunayoishi lakini hujawahi kupata nafasi ya kuviona, kuhusu hilo usijari kwani #MTU#MZURI nipo hapa kwaajiri yako nitahakikisha naku;letea vitu mbali mbali vinavovutia duniani  na hata unapoviangalia unajiskia furaha na kusema ''kweli mungu wa ajabu"

Leo #mtu #mzuri nimekuletea video ya samaki wanaovutia zaidi duniani wanapatikana chini kabisa ya kina cha bahari huku wakiwa na rangi nzuri na maumbo ya ajabu yanayo vutia zaidi 

nimekuwekea video hapa chini unaweza kuitazama na kuidownload

,,,,,,Tuendelee kuiboresha familia ya #WATU#WAZURI For more info nifollow instagram kwa @pascalzambwe

Uongozi wa Diamond waitolea ufafanuzi kauli yake kuhusu kuidhinisha video za wasanii wa Bongo kupigwa MTV.

Meneja wa Diamond platinum Babu tale ametole ufafanuzi wa kauli ya diamond kuhusu kuidhinisha kuchezwa kwa video za wasanii wa kibongo katika vituo vikubwa vya muziki Africa “Ingekuwa kweli nyimbo ya Harmonize ambaye ndio msanii wa Diamond, ingekuwa Exclusive MTV au ingekuwa inapigwa kila siku kwasababu ndio biashara yake, si ndio, hilo sio neno la kweli, yule aliyetoa hiyo habari amechukua kichwa cha habari na kukinya habari kwa watu wengine” 

“Diamond alihojiwa, alikuwainterview kwenye.. moja ya swali aliloulizwa wasanii gani ambao umewasaidia, na je, unasupport mziki wa nyumbani kwenda nje? yeye akajibu mbona mimi nasaidia watu wengi na kuna kipindi huwa napigiwa simu mtu anauliza labda unamjua fulani mzuri? kuna vipindi, media za nje huwa zinanipigia unamjua fulani mzuri? me nawaambia mzuri kwasababu ya kutengeneza mazingira watu wote tutoke tutangaze mziki wetu nje, alieandika kile kichwa cha habari akasema kwamba Diamond ndiye anayeamua myimbo fulani kwenda sehemu fulani kitu ambacho siyo cha kweli, kama Diamond angekuwa anaamuahivyo maana yake hayo maamuzi anafanya na menejimenti basi nyimbo zote za sijuhi TMK, za TipTop, za mkubwa na wanawe za watu wote wa karibu na Diamond wote ndio zingekuwa zinapigwa sana kuliko hata wengine” Babu Tale aliongeza.

Unawez kuangalia #MTU #MZURI Nimekuwekea hapa chini video ya diomond platinumz akihojiwa katika kipindi cha papaso ambapo ndio cha chanzo cha kutokea maneno juu ya kauli yake hiyo.

..........tuendelee kuiboresha familia ya #WATU #WAZURI For more info nifollow instagram kwa @pascalzambwe

By pascalzambwe.

You can’t have too much of a good thing, can you? And sex is definitely a good thing. Several studies show that couples are likely to be satisfied with their relationship when they have more sex. But small kids, work worries or a new Scandinavian crime series can downgrade sex as the activity of choice. So wouldn’t it be nice to know exactly how much sex you need to have a happy relationship?

The solution

Well, according to a study in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science, the magic number is once a week. The study used data on sexual frequency and happiness from more than 30,000 Americans who took the General Social Survey between 1989-2012. The survey found that couples were happier if they had more sex, but that more than once a week didn’t increase their happiness. The once-a-week rule held true regardless of age, sex, or length of relationship. The study found no link between happiness and how often someone had sex if they were single.

Amy Muise, the lead author, says that this is the first study to show a curvilinear relationship between sex and happiness – that the association levels off at once a week rather than being linear.

The take-home message, she says, is that the pressure is off – the average person doesn’t have to have sex as often as possible. “Sex,” she says, “does not have limitless benefits for wellbeing such that more is always better. Instead, it seems that only too little is bad.”

While other studies show that men report higher sexual desire than women, this research suggests that having sex more than once a week doesn’t make them any happier. The study did not look at quality of sex, but research suggests that couples feel mostly positive about their sexual experiences. Muise says positive feelings about sex last for at least the next day, so, strictly speaking, it is unlikely that daily sex is ever necessary.

The average amount of sex that couples have is, in fact, once a week, though this is not the optimum amount of sex if you are trying for a baby.

This new study shows only an association, not causation, but it follows a study published last May in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization that found couples who were having sex about once a week and were asked to double their amount of sex enjoyed it less and were slightly less happy than before. The authors concluded that asking couples to have more sex may not be the best idea – people have to want to initiate it for themselves, not for a research study. Muise’s study did not find that more sex made couples unhappy – only that having too little had that effect.

,,,follow me instagram by @pascalzambwe.

By,Fatma Mzee

England’s chief medical officer Dame Sally Davies has suggested that after work, instead of a glass of wine, people choose a cup of tea. Uproar. Statues crying blood. The worst. How dare she rip our sacred poison from us, said the alcohol-drinking world, through lips tinted a dry cabernet blue, their hair smelling just slightly of fat. Burn everything immediately on a fire of outrage and Twinings.

I nodded along. If they were to go further, to protest the obscenity, to show that I am edgy and vital and up for it, I would march with them, too. I would march, propping up a banner saying SAVE OUR FERMENTED JUICE or I would shuffle, as the back legs of a beer bottle or carafe. But my filthy secret would march with me, craving the hot teat of a teapot, the steaming mug of tasteless nectar that even now, with a supersized SportsDirect only recently in me, I yearn for. Tea. Lovely tea.

There’s this advert on the radio for, I think, life insurance? Life itself? But towards the end, after the accident, ladders, roofs, after the payout, the payoff – a rich northern voice, tones of regional Shakespeare, suggests, “a nice cup of tea”. And under my breath, I croak: “Trigger warning.” It’s too late by then. My mouth is swollen with longing. For tea, for the whole sorry ceremony. Then with the longing comes the despair. I weep inside for all my basic-ness that it reveals. I am a lazily drawn British character in an American novel. Bad teeth, sarcasm, tea. The radio advert gives way to an Adele song, and I know myself all of a sudden, and I am disappointed, again.

So this is me coming out. I prefer tea to drink. Not the taste, of course. Because what does tea taste of, really? It tastes of what I imagine eBay tastes like. Like an old book, fallen in the bath. And not the burning sip, of course, because it is never the right temperature, first being scalding and then almost immediately being tepid and a huge disappointment. And not the “Britishness”, of course, because that whole myth is Ukip- ish and twee. No. I like tea for the ritual and for the settling down. Also, it is home. It is like building a fire when lost in the woods – you put the kettle on, and there you are.

It brings home to difficult places hospitals, wakes, work, too. Offices are designed around tea. They are built upon it like ancient burial grounds. Google, you can keep your free sushi, your egg-freezing perks I have a mug that says “Fabulous and Fifty” and I have a tap. During a tea run, these fools that you sit next to for eight hours a day become actual people, with feelings, albeit ones about the precise colour you must aim for with your milk, and you see they are tortured as if human, and all craving the warmth of tea/their father’s love.

Tea is better than booze, but you will rarely hear anyone say so, because it sounds disgusting. Do you remember when David Cameron was interviewed in his kitchen, and there was a red “Calm Down Dear” chopping board next to the kettle? To argue for tea is to be perceived as this chopping board – the worst thing, in a room of the worst things. Because not only are you dull, you are provincial and you are offensive. Except, sorry.

If I were to dare to counter the pro-winers, who surely talk quite loud and with sincerity, I would argue that all the things that drunkenness does, tea does better. 

If alcohol helps you forget, tea helps you remember. TV is good, but never great, without tea. Chat is never great without tea. Birth and death require it – the best cups I’ve ever had were in a backless paper gown. Alcohol enables big talk, but tea is for small conversation, and that’s the good bit that makes us know each other.Alcohol is sound and fury, tea is thoughtful and full of pause, even if the thoughts are centred around a KitKat, maybe two.

A stiff drink when you get home dulls an ache but stokes a fire – Dame Sally’s cup of tea, it soothes it instead and sits with you while your shoulders relax. Alcohol enables lunging in the dark, but tea, crucially, enables the 26 years to come.

By.Leah Migila

Trips to Stoke have been the stuff of nightmares for Arsène Wenger in the past but this game will not live long in the memory, never mind keep the Arsenal manager awake. In the end it was neither the big step forward that Wenger had hoped for, nor the couple of paces back that would have left Arsenal open to the same old accusations about their lack of stomach for a fight and whether they have what it takes to sustain a title challenge.

Perhaps in the context of what has happened to Arsenal in recent times at the Britannia Stadium a point should be cherished, especially on an afternoon when the temperature struggled to get above freezing, snow was shoved up against the advertising hoardings and the injured Mesut Özil remained in north London.

Given what unfolded on the pitch it was tempting to think that the German – who Wenger said was struggling with some swelling on his foot but will be back for next Sunday’s game against Chelsea – had the right idea by staying in the warm. Despite all the pre-match hype about the enmity surrounding this fixture, the game was a slow burner, struggled to fully ignite and ended up being a tale of two goalkeepers, with Jack Butland and Petr Cech the two outstanding players.

Cech once again demonstrated what a difference he has made to Arsenal this season, whether coming off his line to bravely punch the ball clear or make crucial saves, most notably the one in the 90th minute when he stuck out his boot to deny Joselu a late winner after Aaron Ramsey had cleared Jonathan Walters’ glancing header off the line.

In many ways it felt fitting that Ramsey should have near enough the last word. The Stoke supporters mercilessly booed the Welshman’s every touch, presumably for his reluctance to accept Ryan Shawcross’ apology for breaking his leg at the Britannia Stadium six years ago, and there was also some unsavoury and shameful chanting by a section of the home fans, who sang: “Aaron Ramsey, he walks with a limp”.

Wenger chose his words carefully when asked for his thoughts. “I don’t listen too much, I focus on the game,” Arsenal’s manager said. “I shut my ears and I think that’s the best way to deal with it. I don’t know what to do about it. I have no influence on it. When people get together sometimes they forget their individual responsibility and maybe when you go home and watch it on television you are less proud.”

While disappointed that Arsenal “missed two points” and failed to record their first victory at the Britannia Stadium in six attempts, Wenger praised his players for the way they handled a fixture that been hostile in the past and so often ended up with them being turned over.

“We wanted to win the game but looking at the history we have here it is a positive result,” said Wenger, whose team returned to the top of the table. “Overall it was an old-fashioned Stoke battle because they made the game very physical. The crowd was up for it, the players were up for it, they went for a very direct game, we had to show a physical response – fighting spirit and togetherness – which we did.”

Mark Hughes, not surprisingly and quite justifiably, took issue with a few of those comments. There was nothing particularly physical about the game, so much so that Craig Pawson, the referee, never had reason to show a yellow card. “I’m not sure what game Arsène’s been watching but there we go,” the Stoke manager said.

Arsenal’s best chances fell to Olivier Giroud but on both occasions Butland produced excellent saves and showed why he is regarded so highly. The first opportunity came to Giroud following a deft pass from Joel Campbell but Butland was quickly off his line and parried the Arsenal striker’s attempt to cuAfter tipping over Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain’s effort later in the first half, Butland made a wonderful save low to his left two minutes after the interval. Giroud had managed to lose his marker and met Ramsey’s corner with a powerful downward header that the young England international did ever so well to keep out.

“It’s early days for Jack. It’s only his first season as a Premier League No1 and he’s started remarkably well,” Hughes said. “He’s had 20-odd games and once again he’s proved what a great goalkeeper he is. All the elite teams have a top-class keeper and we’ve got one as well. He’s not at the standard of Petr Cech yet because he’s not been doing it over a longer period like Petr Cech has, but undoubtedly he’s got the potential to be one of the top keepers.”

Cech was certainly busy in the second half, with the Arsenal keeper making a fine double save to deny first Joselu and then Bojan Krkic. Joselu, who must have been fed up with the sight of the Arsenal keeper by the end, saw another low shot turned behind by Cech before that frantic goalmouth skirmish in the closing moments when Wenger’s team were living dangerously.

By,Azory orema

Louis van Gaal said Manchester United’s victory over Liverpool has given the side a “fantastic boost” that puts them back in the title race.

Wayne Rooney’s powerfully struck 78th-minute winner lifted United to 37 points, seven behind Arsenal and Leicester City, the joint leaders, and was United’s second league victory of 2016. Van Gaal’s team are unbeaten in four matches in all competitions this year.

The gap to the top has closed for United after Arsenal’s goalless draw at Stoke Cityon Sunday followed Leicester dropping two points at Aston Villa on Saturday.

“To beat Liverpool is always important,” Van Gaal said. “It was important because our competitors have lost points.” Asked if he believed United could win the championship, Van Gaal said: “We are seven points behind now. We have a lot of matches still to go. We started 2016 very good with a lot of wins – this game will give a big boost to the players and the fans and the environment ofManchester United

You have to see it always in perspective. It is for the fans, for me and the players a fantastic win and it will give us a boost. There are matches we have played much better than today and in that perspective I can’t say it is a good day becauseLiverpool dominated in the first half.”

Although Liverpool were the better side for most of the match Jürgen Klopp’s team failed to take their chances. Rooney did so to score for a fifth time in his last four games. Van Gaal said: “A striker who scores is always very important and now he is scoring in a row and we are winning in a row. I’m very happy for him but also for Manchester United. And for the fans. Everyone wants to see Rooney scoring.”

Van Gaal believes there is far more to come from his side. “When I see this game then I think we can still improve but it was good enough to win at Liverpool away,” the manager said.

The one sour note for United was Ashley Young’s injury, the right-back having to be replaced by Cameron Borthwick-Jackson as half-time neared.

“Ashley Young was a big question if he could play, we are overloading him a little bit because he has to play a lot of matches,” Van Gaal said. “I don’t think it is a very bad injury.”

Liverpool remain in ninth place and Klopp was left frustrated. “I didn’t see too many chances for Manchester United and we didn’t take ours,” the manager said. “Of course it is frustrating. We lost a game that we should not have lost. The goal was to defend and we didn’t do it. That is our responsibility. We have to defend set pieces better.

“We did really well creating the chances, but there were a lot of situations where we could have created more chances and didn’t. There were a lot of things but we lost in a derby against Manchester United so I can’t be very positive at this moment so soon after the game.”

By, Naomi Kipangula

The meaning of Michelle Obama’s upper arms is a topic to which we will clearly need to return at length before this presidency is out, but for now let’s talk about the dress. The colour was the prime talking point of the State of the Union address, before designer Narciso Rodriguez confirmed that it is officially “marigold”. (The exact same colour was mustard when J Lo wore it to the Golden Globes two days earlier, but go figure) The sunniness of the tone was a deliberately upbeat note, chosen as the Obamas begin the final, legacy-minded stretch of their White House tenure. Compare and contrast with last year’s serious, dark-toned skirt suit, which chimed with her husband’s 2015 speech focussing on income inequality.

The dress evoked elements of the first lady’s greatest fashion hits. The inauguration of 2009 is a key reference here. First, the intriguing color recalled the dress and coat she wore that day, a a paler yellow which sparked a similar naming frenzy. (For the record, some called it citrine, but here at the Guardian we backed lemongrass.) For Obama’s arrival last night, her marigold dress was teamed with a purple coat, a daring color combination which also harked back to that inauguration, when the first lady wore olive green gloves with her pale yellow coat, and Malia and Sasha wore bright, jewel-toned scarves in contrasting colors. Bright colors for optimism, and surprising combinations for daring: these are central to the Michelle Obama fashion message.

The dress’ designer was Narciso Rodriguez. Rodriguez also designed both the black and red dress Michelle Obama wore on election night is 2008, and the sleeveless shift in aubergine (or rather, “eggplant”) which she wore for the first State of the Union address, in 2009. Here, again, Michelle Obama is deliberately reminding us of the excitement and glamour of those first chapters of her time as Flotus. In a conclusion, you need to remind your audience where you started. Naturally, this Flotus is all over that

By. Zambwe mwandele

For 78 minutes it was not the icy temperatures that chilled Michael Carrick, Phil Jones and the rest of Manchester United’s travelling support at Liverpool but a soul-sapping lack of adventure from the team they had paid to see. One swipe of Wayne Rooney’s right foot altered everything and for 25 minutes after the final whistle they reveled in the truism that only the result matters when the Premier League’s fallen heavyweights collide. The grim, occasionally gleeful, reality of life under Louis van Gaal was laid bare.

Four times Van Gaal has faced Liverpool as United manager and four times he has emerged victorious. Each has had a profound effect on Liverpool’s Champions League aspirations, with wins number two and three damaging Brendan Rodgers’ job prospects in the process, and the latest may prove no exception, with Jürgen Klopp’s team eight points adrift of fourth place. The implications for Van Gaal’s future remain to be seen.

Klopp appeared visibly deflated as he discussed another display of promise, missed chances and set-piece vulnerability afterwards. Van Gaal was emboldened as he talked up United’s title prospects on the back of a second league win since 21 November. The intoxicating effects of a United win at Anfield clearly remain, even if the reverberations no longer make an impact on the Premier League summit.

The United manager also described David de Gea’s influential performance as mere routine and he had a point – the Spanish goalkeeper twice saved impressively from Emre Can but was hardly besieged – yet the approach, and the quality on display, was modest in the extreme. Far from a collision between the best the Premier League has to offer, this underlined why two wealthy clubs began the day sixth and ninth in the table.

Rooney settled the contest as he reacted

sharply to a header from Marouane Fellaini, his fellow ex-Evertonian, that rebounded off the crossbar. It was Rooney’s first league goal at Anfield in 11 years and a moment for the United captain, his manager and club to savour. They were on the back foot for much of the game, their timidity in the first half was as bad as their touch on the ball, but they were able to punish Liverpool’s weaknesses in defence and in front of goal.

“We need to improve but today was enough to beat Liverpool away,” said Van Gaal. The armoury at the managers’ disposal – the converted Roberto Firmino leading a Liverpool starting XI with only six league goals to their collective credit this season – was also telling.

Liverpool spent the opening 10 minutes encamped inside their own half as United controlled possession but initial impressions proved misleading.

Klopp’s side almost punished United when Jordan Henderson and James Milner combined to dispossess Morgan Schneiderlin, and Adam Lallana was put clean through by Lucas Leiva’s long ball over the top. Lallana opted for a first-time header, saved almost on the 18-yard line by De Gea, and although the rebound broke kindly for Firmino, he was unable to reproduce the accuracy he had against Arsenal and shot tamely wide.

Milner almost profited from a first-time ball down Liverpool’s right channel, too, driving Firmino’s pass wide from a tight angle, and Henderson shot over twice from distance while also missing the best chance of the opening half.

In contrast to United, the home side’s one-touch football improved considerably as the game wore on and a slick exchange between Lucas, Henderson, Lallana and Firmino released the captain inside the area. Henderson pulled his shot wide of De Gea’s far post. Van Gaal’s side were measured but rarely threatened until Rooney’s late breakthrough.

Not even the chance to pressurise Simon Mignolet from a corner was taken, with Daley Blind swinging a series of awful deliveries away from the Liverpool goalkeeper. Ander Herrera’s sliced shot wide in the 30th minute represented United’s first attempt on goal.

Not even the chance to pressurise Simon Mignolet from a corner was taken, with Daley Blind swinging a series of awful deliveries away from the Liverpool goalkeeper. Ander Herrera’s sliced shot wide in the 30th minute represented United’s first attempt on goal.

The decision to play the left-winger Ashley Young at right-back was aborted shortly before the break when he exited injured following an innocuous challenge on Milner.

Mercifully, the second half was more open, enterprising and interesting, the latter the least that should be expected when these clubs meet.

Greater adventure from Can twice came close to giving Liverpool the lead. Moments after the restart the German international took Lallana’s pass and burst beyond Chris Smalling inside the area but his low, goal-bound shot was deflected wide by De Gea. The United goalkeeper subsequently produced a superior save from Can’s 25-yard drive, clawing away Firmino’s return for good measure, and was relieved when Henderson side-footed tamely into his arms, despite having a free shot from the edge of the area. The missed chances, while not in the gilt-edged category, proved costly.

Anthony Martial went close with a low shot across the face of Mignolet’s goal but United’s travelling contingent had been given no cause for optimism and jeered Van Gaal’s decision to withdraw Herrera for Memphis Depay, before finding themselves rejoicing in Rooney’s decisive 78th-minute strike.

Blind, no doubt learning from earlier errors, played a short corner to Juan Mata and his inviting cross was headed against the bar by Fellaini, towering above the Liverpool centre-backs Mamadou Sakho and Kolo Touré. The ball bounced back to the unmarked United captain, who lashed an unstoppable shot into the roof of the net from close range.

It was Rooney’s 176th league goal for United, the most a player has scored for a single club in the Premier League era, and the seventh goal Liverpool have conceded from a corner this season – more than any other side. Most revealingly, it was the visitors’ first shot on target. Smash and grab seems a fair description.

Man of the match David de Gea (Manchester United)